Pergeseran Otoritas Tafsir Al-Qur'an: Analisis Epistemologi Penafsiran di Era Digital

Authors

  • Abdullah Munir Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Makrifatul Ilmi Bengkulu Selatan Author
  • Hurin’in AM Author

Keywords:

Qur'anic Interpretation; , Epistemology;, Generative AI, Digital Religion;, Religious Authority.

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technology, particularly Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), has significantly transformed how Muslims access, understand, and interpret the Qur'an. Traditionally, the authority of Qur'anic interpretation resided in qualified exegetes possessing expertise in Arabic linguistics, Qur'anic sciences, legal theory, and established interpretive methodologies. Today, however, AI-powered digital platforms provide instant explanations of Qur'anic verses, raising critical epistemological questions regarding interpretive authority, methodological validity, and the position of AI in Islamic knowledge production. This study aims to examine the shift in Qur'anic interpretive authority in the digital era and analyze the epistemological implications of Generative AI in contemporary Qur'anic interpretation. Employing a qualitative library research approach, the study draws upon classical Qur'anic exegesis, Islamic epistemology, digital religion studies, and recent scholarship on Artificial Intelligence in Islamic studies. Data were analyzed using content analysis and epistemological analysis. The findings indicate that Generative AI does not replace the role of qualified exegetes but functions as a knowledge mediator that reshapes the distribution, accessibility, and production of religious knowledge. The observed shift represents not a complete transfer of authority from humans to machines but rather a transformation from individual-centered authority toward digitally mediated knowledge ecosystems. Consequently, this study proposes the reconstruction of Qur'anic interpretive epistemology that positions AI as an assistive analytical tool while maintaining interpretive validity through the principles of Qur'anic sciences, scholarly competence, methodological rigor, source transparency, and academic verification.

References

A. Campbell, H. (2013). Digital Religion Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds.

Alkaabi, A., Abdallah, A., Alblooshi, S., Alomari, F., & Alneaimi, S. (2025). ChatGPT in higher education: Opportunities, challenges, and required competencies in the absence of guiding policies. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 12(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v12i2.6746

As-Suyuthi, J. (n.d.). Al-Itqan fi Ulum Al-Qur’an.

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In FAccT 2021 - Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Vol. 1, Issue 1). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., Brynjolfsson, E., Buch, S., Card, D., Castellon, R., Chatterji, N., Chen, A., Creel, K., Davis, J. Q., Demszky, D., … Liang, P. (2022). On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models. 1–211. http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07258

Faria, M., Nurhalimah, U., Kadafi, M., & Khoiri, A. (2026). Dakwah Islam di Era Digital: Peluang, Tantangan dan Strategi Pemanfaatan Media Sosial. Millatuna Jurnal Studi Islam, 03(01), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.33752/mjsi.v3i01.11256

Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020). GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences. Minds and Machines, 30(4), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1

Fui-Hoon Nah, F., Zheng, R., Cai, J., Siau, K., & Chen, L. (2023). Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 25(3), 277–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814

Kurniawan, F. K., Zakhria, A. K., & Semesta, I. R. L. (2026). Observasi Tingkat Halusinasi pada Model AI Deepseek dalam Menjawab Pertanyaan dengan Ambiguitas Faktual. Etika Teknologi Informasi, 2(1).

Mcclure, P. K. (2019). Hashtag Islam: How Cyber-Islamic Environments Are Transforming Religious Authority, by GARY R. BUNT. Sociology of Religion, 80(4), 542–543. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srz028

Said, A. (2006). Interpreting the Qur’an.

Thapa, S., Shiwakoti, S., Shah, S. B., Adhikari, S., Veeramani, H., Nasim, M., & Naseem, U. (2025). Large language models (LLM) in computational social science: prospects, current state, and challenges. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 15(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-025-01428-9

Ula, S. N., & Muhid, A. (2025). Transformasi Dakwah Digital Melalui Kecerdasan Buatan: Sebuah Kajian Literatur. Inteleksia: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Dakwah, 7(2), 217–236.

Unesco. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (2021). International Organization Initiatives, November, 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780197803325.003.0020

Downloads

Published

2026-07-27

How to Cite

Pergeseran Otoritas Tafsir Al-Qur’an: Analisis Epistemologi Penafsiran di Era Digital. (2026). Jurnal El Makrifah, 4(1), 388-409. https://ojs.stitmakrifatulilmi.ac.id/index.php/elmakrifah/article/view/160

Similar Articles

1-10 of 22

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.